Folkopinionen i Irak går emot ockupationen

En stor majoritet av irakierna vill att USA:s ockupationsarmé lämnar Irak och de tycker dessutom att när ockupationstrupperna lämnar landet kommer våldet att minska och Irak bli mer säkert. Detta enligt en opinionsundersökning framtagen av inte mindre än USA:s State Department.

En liknande undersökning Program on International Policy Attitudes at the University of Maryland pekar på att mer än 70 % av irakierna vill att den irakiska regeringen ska be de utländska trupperna att lämna landet inom ett år. Samtidigt tror mer än 77 % av irakierna att USA vill stanna i Irak och ämnar permanenta de militära baserna i landet.

Snacket om att irakierna själva vill ha kvar ockupationstrupperna i Irak och att USA:s närvaro gör landet säkert är ju som allt annat kring ockupationen en rövarhistoria. De enda som vill ha kvar ockupationen är bombhögern i både USA och Europa samt de irakiska representanterna för ockupationen Premiärministern Nouri al-Maliki och Presidenten Jalal Talabani.

Kopplingen säkerhet och utveckling i Afghanistan

Kopplingen mellan säkerhet och utveckling blir sällan tydligare än i Afghanistan ska den nu avgående försvarsministern Leni Björklund ha yttrat ett antal gånger i sin iver att försvara Sveriges militära samarbete med USA i Afghanistan. Vad Björklund syftar på med säkerhet och utveckling i krigets Afghanistan vet vi inte. Dock har detta samband säkerhet + utveckling fått en enorm betydelse i Afghanistans lukrativa produktion av opium.

Enligt en rapport från FN-kontoret för narkotika och kriminalitet (UNODC) har produktionen sedan USA tog över i Afghanistan ökat 33 gånger. På 5 år har opiumproduktionen ökat med 3 200 %. En annan intressant koppling är att det är just två av de kanske mest militariserade länder i världen med enorm militär inblandning från USA, Afghanistan och Colombia, som är de största drogproducerande ekonomier i världen.

Kanadensaren Michel Chossudovsky skriver att det finns starka västliga affärs- och finansiella intressen bakom opiumproduktionen och liksom oljan och pipelines är det av strategisk vikt att geopolitiskt och militärt kontrollera opiumets produktion och handelsvägar. Vinsterna är enorma mellan 124-194 miljarder dollar per år. Men enligt UNODC stannar endast 2,7 miljarder dollar i Afghanistan, bl a hos krigsherrar som idag är en del av den afghanska statsmakten. Resten kontrolleras av starkare finansiella krafter i väst.

Det går inte att utesluta att en stor del av striderna i Afghanistan är därför strider om kontrollen över narkotikaproducerande områden. Norska Klassekampen har i en artikel uppmärksammat hur striderna i Panjwai-området handlar mindre om att bekämpa talibanerna och mer om kontrollen över vattnet som vattnar vallmofälten Och det råder inget tvivel om att USA och väst med sin militära närvaro skyddar starka ekonomiska intressen i landet. I Helmandprovinsen där Natostyrkorna tog över krigföringen har opiumproduktionen stigit med 162 procent. Makthavarna i Afghanistan har idag direkta kopplingar till opiumhandeln. Svenska Afghanistankommitténs generalsekreterare Bengt Kristiansson menar att ”Opiumet har skapat plågsamma kopplingar mellan den sittande regeringen i Kabul, de gamla krigsherrarna och talibanerna. Dessa nätverk är förklaringen till att Afghanistan inte får bukt med narkotikan”.

Så sambandet säkerhet (militarisering) och utveckling (ex mer produktion av opium) finns i Afghanistan. Dock är innebörden av detta mycket komplicerad och farlig. Vad gäller Sverige så bör man fråga sig vilken funktion svenska trupperna i Afghanistan har egentligen och vilka de har till uppgift att skydda.

Hycklarnas tid är nu

Agneta Norberg från Sveriges Fredsråd skriver om Chiracs hyckleri gällande kärnvapen.

- I Frankrike protesterar folk mot att Frankrike ämnar utprova nya ballistiska robotar som ska placeras på deras ubåtsflotta. Detta rimmar illa med Frankrikes protester mot Irans kärnkraftsprogram. Hyckleri sa Bill, hyckleri var ordet sa Bull. Agneta

Chavez tal till FN

Address to the United Nations

Rise Up Against the Empire
By HUGO CHAVEZSeptember 20, 2006

Representatives of the governments of the world, good morning to all of you. First of all, I would like to invite you, very respectfully, tothose who have not read this book, to read it.
Noam Chomsky, one of the most prestigious American and worldintellectuals, Noam Chomsky, and this is one of his most recent books,'Hegemony or Survival: The Imperialist Strategy of the United States.'"[Holds up book, waves it in front of General Assembly.] "It's anexcellent book to help us understand what has been happening in theworld throughout the 20th century, and what's happening now, and thegreatest threat looming over our planet.

The hegemonic pretensions of the American empire are placing at risk thevery survival of the human species. We continue to warn you about thisdanger and we appeal to the people of the United States and the world tohalt this threat, which is like a sword hanging over our heads. I hadconsidered reading from this book, but, for the sake of time," [flipsthrough the pages, which are numerous] "I will just leave it as a recommendation.

It reads easily, it is a very good book, I'm sure Madame [President] youare familiar with it. It appears in English, in Russian, in Arabic, inGerman. I think that the first people who should read this book are our brothers and sisters in the United States, because their threat is rightin their own house. The devil is right at home. The devil, the devil himself, is right in the house.

"And the devil came here yesterday. Yesterday the devil came here. Righ there." [crosses himself]

And it smells of sulfur still today".

Yesterday, ladies and gentlemen, from this rostrum, the president of theUnited States, the gentleman to whom I refer as the devil, came here, talking as if he owned the world. Truly. As the owner of the world.

I think we could call a psychiatrist to analyze yesterday's statementmade by the president of the United States. As the spokesman of imperialism, he came to share his nostrums, to try to preserve the current pattern of domination, exploitation and pillage of the peoples of the world.

An Alfred Hitchcock movie could use it as a scenario. I would even propose a title: "The Devil's Recipe."

As Chomsky says here, clearly and in depth, the American empire is doing all it can to consolidate its system of domination. And we cannot allow them to do that. We cannot allow world dictatorship to be consolidated.

The world parent's statement -- cynical, hypocritical, full of this imperial hypocrisy from the need they have to control everything.

They say they want to impose a democratic model. But that's their democratic model. It's the false democracy of elites, and, I would say, a very original democracy that's imposed by weapons and bombs and firing weapons.

What a strange democracy. Aristotle might not recognize it or others who are at the root of democracy.

What type of democracy do you impose with marines and bombs?

The president of the United States, yesterday, said to us, right here,in this room, and I'm quoting, "Anywhere you look, you hear extremiststelling you can escape from poverty and recover your dignity through violence, terror and martyrdom.

"Wherever he looks, he sees extremists. And you, my brother -- he looks at your color, and he says, oh, there's an extremist. Evo Morales, the worthy president of Bolivia, looks like an extremist to him.

The imperialists see extremists everywhere. It's not that we are extremists. It's that the world is waking up. It's waking up all over. And people are standing up.

I have the feeling, dear world dictator, that you are going to live therest of your days as a nightmare because the rest of us are standing up, all those who are rising up against American imperialism, who are shouting for equality, for respect, for the sovereignty of nations.

Yes, you can call us extremists, but we are rising up against theempire, against the model of domination.

The president then -- and this he said himself, he said: "I have come to speak directly to the populations in the Middle East, to tell them that my country wants peace."

That's true. If we walk in the streets of the Bronx, if we walk around New York, Washington, San Diego, in any city, San Antonio, SanFrancisco, and we ask individuals, the citizens of the United States,what does this country want? Does it want peace? They'll say yes.

But the government doesn't want peace. The government of the UnitedStates doesn't want peace. It wants to exploit its system of exploitation, of pillage, of hegemony through war.

It wants peace. But what's happening in Iraq? What happened in Lebanon?In Palestine? What's happening? What's happened over the last 100 years in Latin America and in the world? And now threatening Venezuela -- new threats against Venezuela, against Iran?

He spoke to the people of Lebanon. Many of you, he said, have seen how your homes and communities were caught in the crossfire. How cynical can you get? What a capacity to lie shame facedly. The bombs in Beirut with millimetric precision?

This is crossfire? He's thinking of a western, when people would shootfrom the hip and somebody would be caught in the crossfire.

This is imperialist, fascist, assassin, genocidal, the empire and Israelfiring on the people of Palestine and Lebanon. That is what happened. And now we hear, "We're suffering because we see homes destroyed.'

The president of the United States came to talk to the peoples -- to the peoples of the world. He came to say -- I brought some documents with me, because this morning I was reading some statements, and I see that he talked to the people of Afghanistan, the people of Lebanon, thepeople of Iran. And he addressed all these peoples directly.

And you can wonder, just as the president of the United States addresses those peoples of the world, what would those peoples of the world tell him if they were given the floor? What would they have to say?

And I think I have some inkling of what the peoples of the south, theoppressed people think. They would say, "Yankee imperialist, go home." I think that is what those people would say if they were given themicrophone and if they could speak with one voice to the American imperialists.

And that is why, Madam President, my colleagues, my friends, last yearwe came here to this same hall as we have been doing for the past eightyears, and we said something that has now been confirmed -- fully, fully confirmed.

I don't think anybody in this room could defend the system. Let's accept-- let's be honest. The U.N. system, born after the Second World War,collapsed. It's worthless.

Oh, yes, it's good to bring us together once a year, see each other,make statements and prepare all kinds of long documents, and listen togood speeches, like Abel's yesterday, or President Mullah's . Yes, it's good for that.

And there are a lot of speeches, and we've heard lots from the presidentof Sri Lanka, for instance, and the president of Chile.

But we, the assembly, have been turned into a merely deliberative organ.We have no power, no power to make any impact on the terrible situationin the world. And that is why Venezuela once again proposes, here,today, 20 September, that we re-establish the United Nations.

Last year, Madam, we made four modest proposals that we felt to be crucially important. We have to assume the responsibility our heads of state, our ambassadors, our representatives, and we have to discuss it.

The first is expansion, and Mullah talked about this yesterday right here. The Security Council, both as it has permanent and non-permanent categories, (inaudible) developing countries and LDCs must be given access as new permanent members. That's step one.

Second, effective methods to address and resolve world conflicts,transparent decisions.

Point three, the immediate suppression -- and that is something everyone's calling for -- of the anti-democratic mechanism known as the veto, the veto on decisions of the Security Council.

Let me give you a recent example. The immoral veto of the United Statesallowed the Israelis, with impunity, to destroy Lebanon. Right in frontof all of us as we stood there watching, a resolution in the council was prevented.

Fourthly, we have to strengthen, as we've always said, the role and the powers of the secretary general of the United Nations.

Yesterday, the secretary general practically gave us his speech of farewell. And he recognized that over the last 10 years, things have just gotten more complicated; hunger, poverty, violence, human rights violations have just worsened. That is the tremendous consequence of the collapse of the United Nations system and American hegemonistic pretensions.

Madam, Venezuela a few years ago decided to wage this battle within theUnited Nations by recognizing the United Nations, as members of it thatwe are, and lending it our voice, our thinking.

Our voice is an independent voice to represent the dignity and the search for peace and the reformulation of the international system; to denounce persecution and aggression of hegemonistic forces on the planet.

This is how Venezuela has presented itself. Bolivar's home has sought anonpermanent seat on the Security Council.

Let's see. Well, there's been an open attack by the U.S. government, animmoral attack, to try and prevent Venezuela from being freely electedto a post in the Security Council.

The imperium is afraid of truth, is afraid of independent voices. It calls us extremists, but they are the extremists.

And I would like to thank all the countries that have kindly announced their support for Venezuela, even though the ballot is a secret one and there's no need to announce things.

But since the imperium has attacked, openly, they strengthened the convictions of many countries. And their support strengthens us.

Mercosur, as a bloc, has expressed its support, our brothers inMercosur. Venezuela, with Brazil, Argentina, Paraguay, Uruguay, is a full member of Mercosur.

And many other Latin American countries, CARICOM, Bolivia have expressedtheir support for Venezuela. The Arab League, the full Arab League hasvoiced its support. And I am immensely grateful to the Arab world, toour Arab brothers, our Caribbean brothers, the African Union. Almost allof Africa has expressed its support for Venezuela and countries such asRussia or China and many others.

I thank you all warmly on behalf of Venezuela, on behalf of our people,and on behalf of the truth, because Venezuela, with a seat on theSecurity Council, will be expressing not only Venezuela's thoughts, butit will also be the voice of all the peoples of the world, and we willdefend dignity and truth.

Over and above all of this, Madam President, I think there are reasonsto be optimistic. A poet would have said "helplessly optimistic,"because over and above the wars and the bombs and the aggressive and thepreventive war and the destruction of entire peoples, one can see that anew era is dawning.

As Silvio Rodriguez says, the era is giving birth to a heart. There are alternative ways of thinking. There are young people who think differently. And this has already been seen within the space of a meredecade. It was shown that the end of history was a totally false assumption, and the same was shown about Pax Americana and the establishment of the capitalist neo-liberal world. It has been shown,this system, to generate mere poverty. Who believes in it now?

What we now have to do is define the future of the world. Dawn isbreaking out all over. You can see it in Africa and Europe and LatinAmerica and Oceanea. I want to emphasize that optimistic vision.

We have to strengthen ourselves, our will to do battle, our awareness.We have to build a new and better world.

Venezuela joins that struggle, and that's why we are threatened. TheU.S. has already planned, financed and set in motion a coup inVenezuela, and it continues to support coup attempts in Venezuela and elsewhere.

President Michelle Bachelet reminded us just a moment ago of the horrendous assassination of the former foreign minister, OrlandoLetelier.

And I would just add one thing: Those who perpetrated this crime are free. And that other event where an American citizen also died wereAmerican themselves. They were CIA killers, terrorists.

And we must recall in this room that in just a few days there will be another anniversary. Thirty years will have passed from this other horrendous terrorist attack on the Cuban plane, where 73 innocents died, a Cubana de Aviacion airliner.

And where is the biggest terrorist of this continent who took theresponsibility for blowing up the plane? He spent a few years in jail inVenezuela. Thanks to CIA and then government officials, he was allowedto escape, and he lives here in this country, protected by the government.

And he was convicted. He has confessed to his crime. But the U.S.government has double standards. It protects terrorism when it wants to.

And this is to say that Venezuela is fully committed to combating terrorism and violence. And we are one of the people who are fighting for peace.

Luis Posada Carriles is the name of that terrorist who is protected here. And other tremendously corrupt people who escaped from Venezuela are also living here under protection: a group that bombed various embassies, that assassinated people during the coup. They kidnapped meand they were going to kill me, but I think God reached down and our people came out into the streets and the army was too, and so I'm here today.

But these people who led that coup are here today in this countryprotected by the American government. And I accuse the American government of protecting terrorists and of having a completely cynical discourse.

We mentioned Cuba. Yes, we were just there a few days ago. We just camefrom there happily.

And there you see another era born. The Summit of the 15, the Summit of the Nonaligned, adopted a historic resolution. This is the out come document. Don't worry, I'm not going to read it.

But you have a whole set of resolutions here that were adopted after open debate in a transparent matter -- more than 50 heads of state.Havana was the capital of the south for a few weeks, and we have now launched, once again, the group of the nonaligned with new momentum.

And if there is anything I could ask all of you here, my companions, my brothers and sisters, it is to please lend your good will to lend momentum to the Nonaligned Movement for the birth of the new era, to prevent hegemony and prevent further advances of imperialism.

And as you know, Fidel Castro is the president of the nonaligned for thenext three years, and we can trust him to lead the charge very efficiently.

Unfortunately they thought, "Oh, Fidel was going to die." But they'regoing to be disappointed because he didn't. And he's not only alive, he's back in his green fatigues, and he's now presiding the nonaligned.

So, my dear colleagues, Madam President, a new, strong movement has been born, a movement of the south. We are men and women of the south.

With this document, with these ideas, with these criticisms, I'm nowclosing my file. I'm taking the book with me. And, don't forget, I'm recommending it very warmly and very humbly to all of you.

We want ideas to save our planet, to save the planet from theimperialist threat. And hopefully in this very century, in not too long a time, we will see this, we will see this new era, and for our childrenand our grandchildren a world of peace based on the fundamental principles of the United Nations, but a renewed United Nations.

And maybe we have to change location. Maybe we have to put the UnitedNations somewhere else; maybe a city of the south. We've proposed Venezuela.

You know that my personal doctor had to stay in the plane. The chief of security had to be left in a locked plane. Neither of these gentlemen was allowed to arrive and attend the U.N. meeting. This is another abuseand another abuse of power on the part of the Devil. It smells of sulfurhere, but God is with us and I embrace you all.

May God bless us all. Good day to you.

Morgondagens nyheter!